Key Takeaways

  • Contract performance refers both to the legal place where obligations are carried out and to the practical process of monitoring how well obligations are fulfilled.
  • Changes in a party’s place of business generally do not alter obligations; instead, that party bears any additional costs.
  • The place of performance can be set by contract terms, implied by the nature of the work, or determined by default rules.
  • Jurisdiction over contract performance is tied to where obligations occur, unless the parties specify otherwise.
  • Modern practice also emphasizes performance monitoring, including metrics such as timeliness, cost efficiency, quality, and reliability.
  • Performance-based contracting shifts focus from process to results, holding parties accountable for measurable outcomes.

The place of performance of a contract refers to the particular place where the execution of the last act (an act executed by the contracting parties, needed to complete the contract and give it validity) was done.

To settle a legal dispute involving property or parties that are located in different jurisdictions (and where there is a difference between the substantiate laws of the two jurisdictions), the court may decide to apply the lex loci contractus which is the place where the contract was entered into.

Such a decision is governed by the laws in the place of performance of the contract. If the interest allowed by the law in the contract's place of performance is higher than that permitted in the place of contract, the contracting parties can stipulate the higher interest.

Changes to the Place of Business

If there are changes to its place of business before the conclusion of a contract, the concerned party must bear all increase in expenses that are incidental to the contract's performance.

Importance of Monitoring Contract Performance

Beyond determining where a contract is performed, businesses must also evaluate how well performance meets agreed obligations. Contract performance monitoring involves tracking whether deliverables are provided on time, within budget, and to the expected quality standards. Effective monitoring reduces risks of disputes, ensures accountability, and provides a record that obligations were fulfilled. Many organizations use software tools to track deadlines, payments, and compliance milestones, which helps prevent costly breaches and improves contract lifecycle management.

How to Determine the Place of Performance

The contract's place of performance is determined from the terms of the contract. The place where a contractual obligation must be performed is determined by the express terms stated in the contract.

For instance, if the contract stipulates the obligation of one party to build, such an obligation must be carried out on the construction site. This means that the transportation of all goods must be performed in line with the agreed route.

However, rules are needed in cases where the terms of the contract and the circumstances do not stipulate the place of performance. Generally, the party required to perform obligations does so at its place of business. Where monetary obligations are involved, the reverse is the case. The obligor carries out its obligations at the place of business of the obligee.

Although these solutions are not satisfactory, they reflect a need for rules to govern cases where circumstances do not indicate the place of performance and the contracting parties made no alternative arrangement.

To determine the system of law that controls, it is necessary to first determine the jurisdiction of the contract's performance.

Key Metrics for Contract Performance

Performance is not only about where a contract is carried out but also how successfully. Common performance metrics include.

  • Cost efficiency: Whether obligations are met without overspending.
  • Punctuality: Timely delivery of goods, services, or payments.
  • Reliability: Consistency of obligations being met without disruption.
  • Quality standards: Whether deliverables meet specifications and expectations.

By applying these metrics, parties can assess contract success objectively. Tracking these factors also supports stronger relationships with partners, vendors, and clients.

Determining the Jurisdiction of the Contract's Place of Performance

If this is not indicated, it is assumed that contractual obligations are to be performed in the place where the contract was entered into.

  1. If a place of performance is fixed absolutely and expressly stated in the contract, that place becomes the place of performance. However, if the intention of the contracting parties was to perform the contractual obligation in the jurisdiction where the contract was entered into but decided to fix some other place of performance in order to evade the rule of law in that jurisdiction, the place of performance is determined by the intention of the contracting parties. This principle applies to contracts of usurious interests.
  2. If contractual obligations are to be performed in different states/jurisdictions, it is generally held that the laws governing each place of partial performance also govern that part of the contract's performance in that state.
  3. If it is stated that the contract must be performed in part where it is drafted and in part elsewhere, the law of the different places to be performed will govern the execution of contractual obligations unless the parties' intentions indicate otherwise.
  4. If the contract's place of performance is optional, the execution of obligation is controlled by the jurisdiction where the contract was entered into. This means that an insurance firm in one state may issue a policy to be delivered in a different state. Although the terms of the contract policy state that the premium is due in the place where the firm was domiciled, there would be a provision in the policy that stipulates that it could appoint persons to collect its premiums elsewhere. This means that the premiums can be paid where the policy is to be delivered because the contract is governed by the laws of the state where the premiums are paid and where it would be delivered.
  5. The laws of the place of performance control usury if a contract is payable at the lender's main office or any other place designated.

Performance-Based Contracting

In addition to traditional approaches, many organizations adopt performance-based contracting (PBC). Under this model, payment and contract continuation are tied directly to measurable outcomes rather than just activities. For example, a service provider may only be compensated fully if agreed performance levels—such as response times, quality thresholds, or efficiency targets—are achieved. This shifts the focus from process to results, incentivizing higher standards and innovation.

PBC is widely used in government procurement, infrastructure projects, and service agreements where outcomes can be clearly measured. It provides flexibility for providers while ensuring clients receive value for money.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is meant by contract performance?
    Contract performance refers to fulfilling obligations stated in a contract, including the place, timing, and quality of those obligations.
  2. How is the place of performance determined?
    It is usually set in the contract terms. If not, the nature of the obligation or default legal rules decide where performance must occur.
  3. Why are performance metrics important in contracts?
    Metrics such as cost, timeliness, reliability, and quality provide objective measures to evaluate whether obligations are met.
  4. What is performance-based contracting?
    Performance-based contracting ties payments and obligations to specific, measurable outcomes rather than simply requiring a party to perform activities.
  5. Can contract performance rules affect jurisdiction?
    Yes. The laws of the place where obligations are performed generally govern those obligations, unless the contract specifies otherwise.

If you need help with place of performance of a contract, you can post your legal need on the UpCounsel marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of attorneys/lawyers on its site. Attorneys on UpCounsel come from prestigious law schools like Yale Law and Harvard Law and usually have 14 years of legal experience, including work on behalf of or with companies like Airbnb, Menlo Ventures, and Google.