Key Takeaways

  • Mutual assent means both parties have a clear, mutual understanding and agreement on the essential terms of a contract.
  • It is usually established through a clear offer and acceptance, evaluated using the objective reasonable person standard rather than the parties’ subjective beliefs.
  • Communication of assent can be verbal, written, or implied by conduct, but the terms must be definite and mutually understood.
  • While essential to contract formation, mutual assent alone does not create a legally binding contract — other elements like consideration, legal purpose, and capacity must also be present.
  • Courts may reject mutual assent if there is ambiguity, mistake, fraud, duress, or if key terms are missing.

Mutual assent is how two parties begin forming a contract, but it can not be used as a binding contract.

Mutual Assent Defined

When two parties agree to form a contract, this is known as mutual assent.

Mutual assent is generally proven by showing that an offer has been made and accepted. When two parties set to agree to terms that fulfill certain requirements, mutual assent has occurred. Agreeing to these initial terms is the first step in forming a contract.

Importance of Clarity in Mutual Assent

For mutual assent to exist, the terms of the agreement must be stated with enough clarity that each party understands their rights and obligations. Vague or indefinite terms can undermine the existence of mutual assent, even if both parties believe they are in agreement. Courts look for a clear “meeting of the minds,” meaning both sides interpret the agreement in the same way from an objective standpoint. Using precise language and avoiding ambiguous terms reduces the likelihood of disputes over interpretation. This clarity is critical in both oral and written contracts, but especially important in verbal agreements, where there is no written record of the exact terms.

Mutual Assent as a Concept

When two parties wish to enter into a contract, they will negotiate terms. Agreeing to these terms constitutes mutual assent. While mutual assent is an important part of establishing a binding legal contract, it's important to understand that this agreement is not binding in and of itself.

Mutual assent applies to both verbal and written agreement. A written contract is usually easier to enforce than a verbal contract, but when there is a dispute related to a verbal contract, courts will take into account whether mutual assent occurred. Courts use something called a “reasonable person test” to decide if mutual assent exists. Using this test, the court will examine the circumstance under which the contract was agreed to and then determine what the agreement would have meant to a reasonable person.

You should understand that the court does not consider what the parties involved in the agreement thought the agreement meant, only what a reasonable person would have understood.

Objective vs. Subjective Intent in Mutual Assent

When determining whether mutual assent exists, courts apply an objective standard, asking what a reasonable person in the position of each party would have understood based on the outward expressions of intent. This means that even if one party privately interpreted the terms differently, the focus is on what was actually communicated and how it would be perceived by a reasonable observer. Subjective misunderstandings or unspoken intentions generally do not prevent a finding of mutual assent unless they are due to misrepresentation, fraud, or mistake. This objective approach ensures that agreements are enforceable based on tangible evidence rather than personal, undisclosed beliefs.

Mutual Assent Elements

There are two primary elements that are required for mutual assent to occur: offer and acceptance.

An offer is when you promise to perform or refrain from an act in exchange for something you deem valuable. When one party agrees to the offer that has been made, this is known as acceptance. The offer and the acceptance of the deal must be clearly stated so that the agreement could be easily understood by a reasonable person.  

Communication of Offer and Acceptance

For mutual assent to be valid, both the offer and acceptance must be clearly communicated. An offer must be definite and complete, stating all essential terms so the other party can make an informed decision. Acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer without adding or changing conditions — otherwise, it may be considered a counteroffer rather than an acceptance. Acceptance can be communicated verbally, in writing, or through actions that clearly indicate agreement, such as beginning performance. Silence rarely counts as acceptance unless the parties have a history of dealings or the contract terms specifically state otherwise.

The Process of a Contract

Typically, there are three steps in the contract process:

  1. Deliberating the offered deal.
  2. Coming to mutual assent.
  3. Performing and enforcing the contract.

Deliberating the deal involves both parties examining the proposed arrangement and weighing the benefits and potential risks. During this step, both parties will also need to decide if they can trust one another. An agreement is reached when both parties have accepted the proposed terms. This agreement is usually verbal and is also called mutual assent. Parties can verify the agreement by signing a contract or by simply providing verbal confirmation.

The last phase of the contract process is performing and enforcing the contract. This step involves both parties fulfilling their respective obligations as listed in the contract. Should one of the parties fail to fulfill its duties, the other party has the right to file a civil suit for the purposes of enforcement.

Common Issues Affecting Mutual Assent

Mutual assent may be challenged or invalidated if certain issues arise during negotiations or formation:

  • Ambiguity in Terms – If key terms are unclear or open to multiple interpretations, there may be no true agreement.
  • Mistake – A mutual mistake about a fundamental fact may void the agreement.
  • Misrepresentation or Fraud – False statements that induce agreement can negate mutual assent.
  • Duress or Undue Influence – Agreements obtained through coercion or improper pressure are not valid.
  • Conditional Assent – If one party agrees only if certain conditions are met, the contract is not formed until those conditions occur.

By addressing these issues early and documenting the agreement thoroughly, parties can better protect against challenges to mutual assent.

Legally Binding Contract Elements

While mutual assent is important, this agreement cannot create a binding contract on its own. Once an initial agreement has been reached, there are several more steps that must be performed to make a contract legally binding.

Legally binding contracts possess a variety of elements:

  • There must be consideration, which means both parties have agreed to exchange something of value.
  • There needs to be a clear offer by one party and acceptance by the other party.
  • There must be a legal purpose for the contract. Legally binding contracts cannot be used for illegal acts, such as purchasing drugs.
  • Every person involved in the contract must be considered capable, which means they are mentally stable, old enough to enter a contract, and able to understand the contract to which they are agreeing.

When one party fails to perform the duties required of them by the contract, this is known as breach of contract. If a breach of contract occurs, a civil lawsuit can be filed by the party that was damaged by the breach.

Depending on the nature of the breach, there are several remedies that the courts could offer. In some cases, the court may award monetary damages to the injured party. In other circumstances, the court may issue an order requiring the party that breached the contract to fulfill the obligations to which they agreed.

Role of Mutual Assent in Enforceability

While mutual assent is the foundation of any contract, it is only one of several required elements for enforceability. A contract with mutual assent but lacking consideration, legal purpose, or capacity will generally be unenforceable. For example, two parties may agree in principle to an arrangement, but if the agreement involves an illegal act or one party is a minor without legal capacity, the contract cannot be enforced. Courts evaluate mutual assent alongside these other elements to determine whether a contract exists and should be upheld. In disputes, evidence of mutual assent — such as signed documents, correspondence, or witness testimony — plays a key role in proving the existence and terms of the agreement.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is mutual assent in contract law?
    It is the mutual agreement between parties on the essential terms of a contract, typically established through a clear offer and acceptance.
  2. Can mutual assent be implied?
    Yes, mutual assent can be implied through conduct if the actions of both parties clearly indicate agreement to the same terms.
  3. Does mutual assent alone make a contract enforceable?
    No. A valid contract also requires consideration, legal purpose, and capacity in addition to mutual assent.
  4. What can invalidate mutual assent?
    Ambiguity, mistake, misrepresentation, fraud, duress, or undue influence can undermine or void mutual assent.
  5. How do courts determine if mutual assent exists?
    Courts use the objective reasonable person standard, focusing on outward expressions of agreement rather than undisclosed intentions.

If you need help with mutual assent, you can post your legal needs on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.