Key Takeaways

  • Common law is judge-made law developed through precedent, while criminal law consists largely of codified statutes that define crimes and punishments.
  • The U.S. legal system blends both: statutory criminal codes are interpreted using common law principles where statutes are silent or ambiguous.
  • Common law emphasizes precedent and consistency, while criminal law emphasizes public order and state enforcement.
  • Overlap exists: many criminal statutes have roots in common law definitions of offenses like theft, assault, or homicide.
  • Understanding common law vs criminal law is crucial for grasping how courts interpret statutes, impose penalties, and protect constitutional rights.

The Common Law

The common law, sometimes known as case law, is a legal system in which previous court decisions establish legal precedents & new decisions must be in keeping with past decisions. Common law may also refer to a legal system which relies on common customs and usages, rather than on codified written laws, or statutes. The common law forms a major part of the legal systems of regions in the world that are or were formerly under the rule of the British Empire, including the United States, with the exception of Louisiana, which takes its model from civil law, or codified decree, in the style of the original French governors.

While judges develop the common law gradually, through the force of their rulings in specific cases, it won't be found in any written form comparable to statutory law. Common law is instead the common consensus of legality and illegality that developed over centuries of individual court rulings in Britain over roughly 800 years.

Criminal Law Defined

Criminal law is a body of statutes and regulations that identify certain behaviors as offenses against society or the state. These laws establish penalties such as imprisonment, fines, or probation to deter and punish wrongdoing. Unlike the evolving nature of common law, criminal law is often codified in state and federal codes. The purpose of criminal law is to maintain order, protect individuals and property, and safeguard the broader public interest. Prosecutors represent the state in criminal cases, and penalties are imposed not to resolve private disputes but to uphold public justice.

Common Law and Statutory Law in the United States

While the common law system is the departure point for the criminal law in the United States, the United States Constitution gives legal precedence to whatever statutory laws the various state and local jurisdictions enact. At this time, most of the criminal law in the United States is codified into statutes. However, many states still directly recognize elements of the common law and, further, it is sometimes necessary to go back to the common law to discover the intrinsic meaning behind a statutory law. For example, a statute may say that negligent homicide is punishable by one to three years in prison without actually defining homicide. In this case, it would be necessary to go back to the common law for the definition.

State legislatures are permitted to pass what laws they see fit, as long as these don't contradict federal statutes, and local legislatures are permitted to pass what laws they see fit, so long as they don't contradict state or federal laws. Declaratory and remedial statutes are frequently passed to reinforce, expand or restrict the common law in the myriad jurisdictions of this country, and the legal landscape can vary considerably from state to state and town to town.

Common Law vs Criminal Law in Practice

Although common law and criminal law serve different functions, they intersect frequently. Many crimes, such as murder or theft, originated in English common law before being codified into U.S. statutes. Courts may still reference common law principles to clarify statutory language or fill gaps where statutes are silent. For example, while a legislature may define “homicide,” the precise boundaries of intent or negligence may require reference to centuries of common law precedent.

Key distinctions include:

  • Source of Authority: Common law evolves from judicial decisions; criminal law arises from statutes.
  • Function: Common law interprets and adapts; criminal law defines prohibited conduct and penalties.
  • Flexibility: Common law adapts gradually; criminal law requires legislative change.
  • Application: Common law informs judicial reasoning; criminal law is enforced by prosecutors with penalties imposed by courts.

The Strength of Common Law

The strength of common law system lies in its flexibility, and the group consensus of judgement that it represents. Because the whole of common law is modified slightly by every court ruling, it is believed to better represent the hearts and minds of the people it seeks to govern.

Overlap and Modern Relevance

In practice, the boundaries between common law and criminal law are porous. For instance, statutory criminal offenses often retain their common law definitions unless explicitly redefined by legislatures. Additionally, judges may draw upon common law principles when statutes leave room for interpretation. This interplay ensures continuity and fairness in the justice system.

Modern reforms have codified most criminal law, but the common law tradition remains vital. It provides judges with interpretive tools to resolve ambiguities, prevents overly rigid application of statutes, and keeps the law responsive to evolving social values. Understanding both systems helps explain why the U.S. legal framework can be simultaneously stable—grounded in precedent—and adaptable to new challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the main difference between common law and criminal law?

Common law is judge-made law based on precedent, while criminal law is codified statutes defining crimes and punishments.

2. Can a crime exist without a statute?

In the U.S., most crimes are defined by statute, but their roots often trace back to common law principles.

3. How does common law influence modern criminal law?

Courts may rely on common law definitions and precedents to interpret statutory terms or fill gaps where statutes are silent.

4. Why is precedent important in criminal cases?

Precedent ensures consistency and fairness, guiding judges to apply the law in ways that align with past rulings.

5. Do all U.S. states use common law in criminal matters?

Yes, all except Louisiana, which follows a civil law tradition, still integrate common law principles into statutory criminal systems.

If you need help with any legal matters, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel only accepts the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.