Key Takeaways

  • IP related litigation covers patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, often involving overlapping claims.
  • Inter partes review (IPR) offers a streamlined way to challenge patent validity but must meet strict deadlines.
  • Courts balance prejudice, timing, and procedural fairness when deciding whether to stay litigation pending IPR.
  • Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence are creating new challenges for courts in intellectual property disputes.
  • Defendants in IP cases may rely on multiple defenses, including non-infringement, estoppel, and lack of novelty.
  • Strategic considerations, such as when to file an IPR and how to coordinate with district court proceedings, are critical for success.

IPR litigation involves intellectual property rights which relates to products that were developed in part to intellectual efforts. These products are normally created thanks to intellectual efforts regarding fine arts or applied art, or a combination of both. Most times, IPR rights relate to designs and trade secrets as well as trademarks, service marks, patents, and copyrights. These rights prohibit such aspects of a product to be passed off to another person or company.

Because intellectual property is so highly valued all across the world, and in many areas, it is considered to be sacred, trademarks and copyrights and other forms of intellectual property are often viewed as tangible in relation to their propriety. There used to be many traditional laws relating to intellectual property, but new laws have recently replaced them; this applies not only in India but various places all across the world.

Inter Partes Review

IPR also stands for inter partes review, which is a process that can be used to cancel claims of enforcement of patents in the United States. When a patent is granted under the first-inventor-to-file law, which is a new law, it means an IPR cannot be filed unless a period of nine months has passed since the post-grant review process has ended. If there is a post-grant review that has recently been instituted, this proceeding must conclude as well before the IPR can be filed.

It is extremely important to understand that there are many comprehensive deadlines incorporated into IPR proceedings. These deadlines must be met in order for the filer to receive an official petition for an IPR. More so, these deadlines have to be met in order for the appeals process to continue.

The value of an IPR lies in the fact that it can be used to challenge patent claims, which is especially beneficial when an entity has been sued for some type of patent infringement. But the IPR petition must be filed within 12 months of the complaint. This deadline starts when the entity receives the complaint, not from the actual date it was filed.

Types of Intellectual Property at Issue in Litigation

IP related litigation is not limited to patents. It commonly spans four primary categories of rights:

  • Patents: Protect inventions and processes but are frequently challenged through IPR or other post-grant proceedings.
  • Trademarks: Cover brand names, logos, and slogans, with disputes often involving consumer confusion or dilution claims.
  • Copyrights: Protect original creative works like software, music, and literature, with cases focusing on unauthorized reproduction or adaptation.
  • Trade Secrets: Guard confidential business information, where litigation often involves misappropriation by competitors or former employees.

Because disputes can cross over multiple areas—such as software being protected by both copyright and trade secret law—litigation strategies must account for overlapping claims.

How to Improve the Favor of an IPR

There are steps you can take to improve the favor of IPR. First, you should choose to wait until the actual IPR has been instituted until you take any action. You may want to stay the related litigation quickly as soon as the complaint is made, but this can actually impact you negatively.

It has been proven time and time again that many courts look favorably upon stay motions if they are filed after the IPR has been initiated, which can take up to six months. Yes, as a defendant, you want to file your IPR petition quite soon after the complaint is filed, but you will want to wait until the USPTO acts before you actually request a stay. In doing this, you are able to present a strong case for stay.

Strategic Considerations in IP Related Litigation

Success in ip related litigation often depends on early strategic choices. Key considerations include:

  • Timing of Filings: Coordinating IPR petitions with district court schedules to strengthen stay requests.
  • Jurisdiction Selection: Forum shopping can influence outcomes, as certain districts have more experience with complex IP cases.
  • Evidence Preservation: Ensuring technical documentation, licensing records, and communications are preserved early to avoid sanctions.
  • Settlement Opportunities: Many disputes resolve before trial through negotiated settlements, licensing agreements, or alternative dispute resolution.

Careful planning can reduce litigation costs, streamline proceedings, and increase the likelihood of favorable outcomes.

Validity of Action Is in the Hands of the District Court

And even when the USPTO institutes an IPR and cancels the challenged claims, the validity of this action still remains in the hands of the district court. Any unchallenged claims could still require a trial if deemed necessary by the district court. When an IPR challenges only some of a patent owners patents, the claims asserted are not likely to stay the litigation. And even when the USPTO institutes an IPR and cancels the challenged claims, the validity of this action still remains in the hands of the district court. Any unchallenged claims could still require a trial if deemed necessary by the district court.

The Role of Emerging Technologies in IP Disputes

Recent cases show how courts are grappling with intellectual property issues arising from artificial intelligence (AI). For example, disputes now involve:

  • Authorship and Copyright: Whether AI-generated works qualify for copyright protection.
  • Patent Eligibility: Questions about whether AI-assisted inventions meet legal standards for novelty and non-obviousness.
  • Data Use and Ownership: Claims about training datasets potentially infringing on copyrighted material.

Judges are applying existing frameworks but acknowledge that traditional legal doctrines may not fully address the complexities introduced by AI and other advanced technologies.

Considering Prejudice

It's also not uncommon for courts to determine whether or not issuing a stay will cause any type of prejudice on the patent owner. A court is very unlikely to grant a stay if the claim is brought forth with prejudice, such as by a direct competitor of the patent owner. This is why it is always a good idea for the moving party to show the court that there is no competition between them and the patent owner.

Typical Remedies and Outcomes in IP Litigation

Courts in ip related litigation may grant a range of remedies depending on the type of infringement:

  • Injunctions: To stop continued use, sale, or distribution of infringing products or works.
  • Monetary Damages: Including compensatory damages, lost profits, or reasonable royalties.
  • Enhanced Damages: In cases of willful infringement, courts may award up to triple the calculated damages.
  • Attorney’s Fees: Awarded in exceptional cases.

These remedies aim both to compensate the rights holder and to deter future infringement.

Types of Defenses to Be Used by the Accused

If you are being accused of infringement, it is in your best interest to use any and all types of conceivable defense. There is a long list of possible defenses you can, including:

  • Various validity defenses
  • Estoppel
  • Non-infringement
  • Lack of novelty
  • Waiver
  • Laches
  • Inadequate written description

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What types of cases fall under IP related litigation?
    They include disputes over patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, often with overlapping claims.
  2. How does inter partes review (IPR) fit into IP disputes?
    IPR allows parties to challenge the validity of a patent at the USPTO, often running parallel to district court cases.
  3. What remedies are available in IP litigation?
    Courts may award injunctions, monetary damages, enhanced damages for willful infringement, and attorney’s fees.
  4. How is AI affecting IP litigation?
    AI introduces novel issues, such as authorship of AI-generated works and the legality of using copyrighted data to train algorithms.
  5. How can defendants strengthen their position in IP cases?
    By carefully timing IPR filings, preserving evidence, using multiple defenses, and exploring settlement or licensing opportunities.

If you need help with IPR litigation, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.