Key Takeaways

  • Bilateral clearing agreements are reciprocal trade arrangements between two governments where payments are made in local currencies, typically expressed in a major currency like the U.S. dollar.
  • These agreements differ from clearing member trade agreements, which formalize relationships between investors and brokers for efficient trade settlement.
  • Central clearing through clearinghouses has grown as a safeguard against systemic risk, reducing reliance on bilateral clearing but also introducing new regulatory and operational complexities.
  • Recent regulatory changes, especially U.S. Treasury central clearing rules, are reshaping how securities and repos are traded and settled, emphasizing risk management, transparency, and transition planning.
  • Clearing firms and the ISDA Master Agreement play critical roles in ensuring smooth settlement processes and enforceability of bilateral and multilateral trades.

Both bilateral clearing agreements and clearing member trade agreements can be called clearing trade agreements but the two are entirely different from one another. Clearing member trade agreements are common and well accepted, while bilateral clearing agreements are often referred to as political hot potatoes.

What Is a Reciprocal Trade Agreement?

A reciprocal trade agreement between two governments for a limited time and a specific amount is called a bilateral clearing agreement. The exporters in both countries are paid in their local currency, although the value in the agreement is usually expressed in a major currency, such as the U.S. dollar.

Modern Use of Bilateral Clearing in Trade

While bilateral clearing was once widely used during periods of currency instability or wartime, its use has declined due to free-market reforms and the growth of global clearing systems. Today, bilateral clearing agreements are rare and often politically sensitive, as they can be seen as circumventing open market mechanisms. However, in some emerging markets or between politically aligned countries, bilateral clearing may still be used as a tool to settle trade imbalances or preserve foreign exchange reserves. These arrangements are closely monitored by international organizations such as the World Trade Organization because of their potential to distort global trade flows.

What Is Bartering?

In earlier times, bartering was very common and was often used when trading wheat for oil. Bartering usually takes place on a bilateral basis, but is sometimes seen involving multiple parties. While common and accepted at one time, it is now commonly said that bartering is inefficient. Due to the disruption of bilateral clearing agreements on the free market, the agreements are now condemned by the World Trade Organization (WTO), and have been scarcely used since the end of World War II.

What Is a Clearing Member Trade Agreement?

A clearing member trade agreement is a document that establishes a working relationship between an investor and a broker. Basically, the agreement allows the investor to explore investment options by taking advantage of the expertise of other brokers. It allows the investor to consolidate all trades through one broker at the end of a trading day, which provides a smooth and quick clearing process. The consolidation saves time while cutting costs on fees and commissions.

What Do Clearing Firms Do?

Due to the popularity and widespread practice of clearing agreements, a whole industry of clearing firms has been developed. The practice has particularly grown among investors who seek to diversify their portfolios.

Not only are clearing firms helpful in providing knowledge in a range of investment trades, such as bond derivatives, commodities, and futures contracts, they are able to provide banking expertise. They play a major part in worldwide trade and transfers that take place between banks, both on a domestic and international basis.

Clearing firms are often expected to carry out several tasks as set forth in the clearing agreement. These tasks may include any of the following:

  • Accounting responsibilities on behalf of the client
  • Settling trade debts
  • Overseeing scheduled withdrawals and payments to investment accounts

As the foundation for secure markets, The Options Clearing Corporation, also commonly referred to the OCC, monitors the clearing process under regulations established by the Securities and Exchange Commission and operates under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, also known as the SEC. Founded in 1973, OCC is the largest equity derivatives clearing organization in the world. The corporation acts as both the issuer and guarantor for option and futures contracts.

Regulators continue to create market rules that may or may not ultimately be consistent with market practices that have been used for 30 years. After the 2008 financial crisis, the OCC was called upon to adjust its operations to better address risks.

Central clearing has grown significantly and is without a doubt a shift in the right direction to reduce systemic risk resulting from bilateral trading. Central counterparties, CCPs, have indeed proved resistant, and the number of banks and other financial institutions that route their transactions through CCPs has broadened.

Central clearing primarily changes the linkages and exposures in the financial system. The links take different forms and generate several layers of interconnection. However, central clearing could give rise to other systemic risks. A focus on risk management of credit or on liquidity risk may affect market price in ways currently unidentified. The intricate linkages between banks and CCPs add to these difficulties. It is probable that CCPs can cushion the system against relatively small shocks, however, this is at the risk of potentially intensifying larger ones.

Central Clearing vs. Bilateral Clearing

The global shift from bilateral clearing toward central clearing has accelerated following financial crises and regulatory reforms. Central counterparties (CCPs) now play a key role in guaranteeing trades and reducing counterparty credit risk. For example, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently finalized rules mandating central clearing for most U.S. Treasury securities and repurchase agreement (repo) transactions.

This transition aims to:

  • Reduce systemic risk by concentrating settlement obligations through CCPs.
  • Increase market transparency by standardizing reporting and risk management.
  • Strengthen resilience during periods of financial stress.

However, industry participants have raised concerns about implementation timelines, liquidity pressures, and operational readiness. These challenges highlight the trade-offs between the efficiency of bilateral clearing and the stability provided by central clearing

ISDA Master Agreement

Considerable focus has been on the ISDA Master Agreement in hopes of ensuring legal enforceability around the world with regard to bilateral trading. The ISDA Master Agreement was created in 1985 as a result of the tremendous growth of the foreign exchange and interest rate swap markets, which account for trillions of dollars in daily trade.

Regulatory Changes and Treasury Clearing Rules

The U.S. Treasury market, the largest and most liquid government securities market in the world, is undergoing a major structural change. Under new SEC rules, central clearing will become mandatory for the majority of Treasury cash trades and repos.

This change has important implications:

  • Repo Market Impact: More transactions will flow into clearinghouses, potentially affecting the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). Research suggests that while SOFR remains stable, broader participation in cleared repos may enhance rate reliability.
  • Operational Adjustments: Market participants must update systems, collateral management processes, and risk monitoring frameworks to comply.
  • Transition Strategies: Firms are advised to conduct gap analyses, update compliance programs, and coordinate with clearing firms to ensure readiness before enforcement deadlines.

These developments mark a departure from traditional bilateral clearing, underscoring a global trend toward centralized oversight and systemic risk reduction.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the difference between bilateral clearing and central clearing?
    Bilateral clearing is a direct settlement between two parties, while central clearing routes trades through a clearinghouse that guarantees performance and manages counterparty risk.
  2. Why are bilateral clearing agreements controversial?
    They are often criticized for distorting trade and avoiding free-market pricing. International bodies like the WTO discourage their use.
  3. How do the new Treasury central clearing rules affect markets?
    The SEC’s rules require most Treasury and repo trades to be centrally cleared, aiming to reduce systemic risk and improve transparency.
  4. Will the new rules impact SOFR?
    Yes. Since more repos will be cleared, they will be included in SOFR calculations, but studies show SOFR remains stable under expanded coverage.
  5. How should firms prepare for the transition from bilateral to central clearing?
    Firms should conduct compliance reviews, update collateral and risk management systems, and coordinate with clearinghouses to ensure operational readiness.

If you need help with creating a bilateral clearing agreement, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.